Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Hemingway, truth and icebergs

September's Ni/Yama of the Month is Satya, the Yama meaning "truth." 
"What is Satya? Being Truthful. Why be Satya? So that one's actions are spontaneously true or right."  Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, 2.36)

Truth plagues me as I write the applications for my academic job search. Obviously I'm not lying in my applications, so its not a question of fact versus fiction. What bothers me is "truth" in academic writing style.

The jargon that many academic authors use makes me crazy. Bigger words and longer sentences do not make writing easier to read. Using obscure adjectives does not make you smarter than your reader. No one really understands Poststructuralism, no matter what they say. But I find myself using that same type of writing to make my projects more "interesting" or more "intellectual."

Whether you call it academic writing, exaggeration, or just plain lies, it's gilding the lily. It's unnecessary. If I don't believe in my own research and teaching plans, extra adjectives and fancy theories won't deceive the hiring committees. W.C. Fields's advice to baffle with bull if you can't dazzle with brilliance falls flat here.

But I do believe in my plans, and I believe others would find them interesting as well. That is what I need to communicate, without actually communicating it. You don't say, "This is interesting because..." Instead, you describe what "it" is in a way that others will find interesting, because YOU alone can explain "it." But that explanation should also only be a small portion of it, even though it evokes the entire thing. This is basically Ernest Hemingway's Iceberg Theory from Death in the Afternoon:

                    "If a writer of a prose knows enough about what he is writing about
                    he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing
                    truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though 
                    the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of the iceberg is due
                    to only one-eighth of it being above water. The writer who omits things 
                   because he does not know them only makes hollow places in his writing."

Icebergs are everywhere lately. Last week I read an article on how to stand out in the academic job search that praised "writing in the kind of iceberg-crisp prose you are likely to find at the start of each week's New Yorker-- sentences of no more than 15 words--with real verbs--and no jargon." In other words, write like Ernest Hemingway.

     1. Use short sentences - namely, declarative sentences.
     2. Use short paragraphs - more focus in each section.
     3. Use vigorous English - specifically active verbs.
     4. Be positive, not negative - say what something is, rather than what it isn't.

Heminway has long been one of my favorite writers. When my friends were nuts for Fitzgerald in high school, I was devouring Papa instead. A Moveable Feast is still one of my favorite books. Whatever you think of him personally, you have to admire his writing.

We don't think or act in long, flowery sentences. In my mind at least, the syntax is more like subject-verb-object or just subject-verb. Jargon isn't truthful, and the action of creating jargon certainly isn't truthful either. Jargon does not equal Satya, which makes writing jargon a yogic no-no.

In order to be the change I want to see happening and be truthful, I need to cut out the jargon and (cue irony) eschew obfuscation in my own writing. I can use a simpler, clearer writing style to express the truth of my own plans and my own anti-jargon values. Academic writing could certainly stand to take a few lessons from Hemingway, so it might as well start with me.

I'll let you know how the hiring committees respond to Hemingway and the icebergs.

Check out these resources for writing inspiration from Hemingway:
Ernest Hemingway on Writing by Larry W. Phillips
Ernest Hemingway's Top Five Tips for Writing Well
27 Secrets to Writing like Hemingway
Hemingway's advice on when to stop writing

6 comments:

Matthew said...

Two useful pieces on writing style:

1) http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/students/writing.html

2) http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/jfb/bengor.pdf

Both are by philosophers but should apply to anyone in any subject.

You should definitely avoid Orwell's awful 'Politics and the English Language', though, as well as the stupendously ignorant Strunk & White. People offering advice on writing style usually mention both. Search for posts on either of those two on Language Log to see why they're so bad. A sampling here:

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=992

http://158.130.17.5/~myl/languagelog/archives/003366.html

But though I disagree with Smith's suggestion that Orwell's essay is a good source of tips, Orwell's writing in general is a good example of clear prose (as the LL team love to point out, he consistently violates his own prescriptions).

Melita said...

good luck on your interview!! i hope all goes well for you!

as far as the tea trade, i am going to switch names on sept 15th and send emails later that day or early the 16th. i'm so excited, i can hardly wait :)

City Girl said...

I so feel your pain on this one - lawyers are way way too prone to the same type of flowery nonsense. What kills me is when my drafts that hold small concise sentences are often padded with additional words. Ick.

Julie said...

One of the things that strikes me here is the importance of authenticity. Writing clearly and straightforwardly is a way of being authentic on the page -- academic writing is so often an attempt to pull off the "god trick" (the view from nowhere) linguistically.

purplepaperplanes said...

Loved the Hemingway quote. It is so true! I've been thinking a lot about this especially in the past couple of months. It is annoying to find hard to read papers that use 'confusing the reader' as a tool to seem intellectual. However, I have also come across many academic papers that are very simply and beautifully written. [When I say simple writing, I don't only mean simply constructed sentences, but also conveying a seemingly complicated concept simply.]..I could go on and on about this as I feel quite strongly about it too..lol..But yeah, nowadays while writing (both academic and creative), I have made a sort of rule for myself, that i write as simply and 'truthfully' as I possibly can. No embellishments to make the truth seem deeper.(Because they usually do not).

Am loving your articles- especially the ones relating to academia..:)

Kiki said...

Thanks to all of you for reading and commenting!

Matthew - Thanks for the sites, and for your thoughts on Orwell/S&W. They really do seem to generate a lot of kerfuffle for being so widely recommended, don't they?

Melita - Thank you! I'm very excited about it. And about the tea trade!!!

City Girl - That is exactly what I'm talking about. I read over my work, and the adjectives are just obscenely superfluous. Now I am consciously skipping them.

Julie - Authenticity is right on the money. Being authentic on the page is part of being authentic in general. The Authentic Academic - there's a blog tagline for you!

Lavanya - You and I are absolutely on the same page about this, and it is so refreshing. One person at a time, we can change this crazy system. I'm so glad you're enjoying my posts!

Blog Widget by LinkWithin